Quantcast
Channel: Judge Christopher M. Murray | Michigan Lawyers Weekly
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 427

Legal Malpractice – Continued services constitute ‘matters the claim for malpractice arose’ 

$
0
0
If a plaintiff is injured as a result of legal malpractice but continues to receive related services, for statute of limitation purposes, a distinction must be made between actions taken by counsel as part of an ongoing attorney-client relationship, and remedial efforts concerning past representation. The proper inquiry is whether the new activity occurs pursuant to a current — as opposed to a former — attorney-client relationship.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 427

Trending Articles